Reviews Signal providers MQL5 Signals

MQL5 Signals Review & Trader Rating

3.4/ 5
Mixed
Traders · 0 votes
Awaiting
Editorial
3.425%
External
25%
MQL5 Signals official page image

MQL5 Signals in a nutshell

Review basis

Documentation review using current first-party product, help and legal pages. No live-money performance test was performed.

What the score covers

Marketplace rules, monitoring and copying disclosures. No provider return is assigned to the marketplace.

What remains unknown

Current provider quality and price vary by listing; rules and terms conflict on free subscriptions.

Editorial summary

MQL5 Signals is a marketplace where third-party providers expose monitored MetaTrader accounts and sell subscriptions that can copy trades. The monitoring is useful, but provider risk, execution differences and a current rules-versus-terms pricing inconsistency require careful checking.

MQL5 Signals is a marketplace, not one signal provider. Each return and risk record belongs to one third-party provider and monitored account.

MetaQuotes transmits trades through MetaTrader, but broker symbols, leverage, latency and execution can still differ. The terms do not guarantee profitability.

The current Rules page says subscriptions are fee-based, while subscriber terms still mention free subscriptions. Rules take precedence, so users should check the live listing. Sales are generally final, apart from a narrow renewal remedy when a signal becomes unavailable.

MQL5 Signals is infrastructure and a marketplace, so the page must not present it as one trading system. Each listing is tied to a provider and monitored MetaTrader account. The useful evidence sits at listing level: account age, trades, growth, drawdown, deposits, withdrawals and subscription conditions. None of those numbers can be averaged into a meaningful marketplace result.

Copying takes place inside MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5. The subscriber chooses settings and links one signal to one trading account. Symbol names, contract sizes, leverage, minimum lot size, execution speed and broker liquidity can differ from the provider account. Those differences can produce smaller positions, delayed fills, skipped trades or a result that diverges materially from the chart shown on the listing.

Pricing also belongs to the selected listing. Current rules describe fee-based subscriptions, while subscriber terms retain wording about free subscriptions. The rules state that they prevail, so the live order screen is the final price check. The subscriber terms generally make purchases final, apart from a limited renewal remedy when a subscribed signal becomes unavailable.

Before subscribing, inspect whether growth depends on deposits, whether drawdown is realised or floating, how long the account has traded, and whether one position dominates the history. Start with a separate low-allocation account and compare copied fills with the provider log. Stop-loss use, trade frequency and average reward-to-risk must be checked per provider because the marketplace does not standardise them.

Have you traded with MQL5 Signals?

Your rating goes straight into the community score. Click a star to vote — change it any time.

/ 5 0 trader votes
Click a star to vote

Is MQL5 Signals right for you?

Best for

  • MetaTrader users who will evaluate a named provider account
  • Users who want native in-terminal copying

Avoid if

  • You want a platform-wide verified return
  • You need a broad refund right

Evidence and transparency breakdown

Dimensions our methodology can assess from the evidence stored for this review.

  • Transparency3.7 / 5 · Good

    Detailed rules and terms are public, with one material inconsistency to verify at checkout.

  • scope control4.5 / 5 · Excellent

    The review keeps product, marketplace, provider and strategy-level claims separate.

Compatible platforms

Where this works and how it's priced.

Track record

Monthly records and verification status stored for this review. Blank metrics were not established · sources: mql5.com.

MonthReturnDrawdownSharpeSortinoTrades
Provider-specific records only

Pricing model

Modelprovider_subscription
AmountVaries by signal USD

Verify the live listing because current Rules and older terms differ on free offers.

Track record

3.8 /5

Provider accounts are monitored and displayed.

Each record belongs to one account and is not a marketplace-wide result. We separate records shown by the service from independently audited subscriber outcomes and do not convert provider examples into a platform-wide return.

Cost

3.0 /5

Prices are provider-specific.

The live listing controls price; sales are generally final. The score includes every published platform or subscription charge we could identify, while broker spreads, financing and slippage remain account-specific.

Risk management

3.2 /5

Copy settings exist, but responsibility stays with the subscriber.

The terms emphasize copying risk and execution differences. A useful risk feature must define an actionable limit or invalidation point; it cannot replace position sizing or the user's loss cap.

Communication

3.5 /5

Signals are delivered inside MetaTrader.

Native delivery does not remove slippage or symbol differences. We judge whether a user can identify the instrument, direction, timing and invalidation before acting, rather than rewarding alert volume.

Transparency

3.7 /5

The legal model and monitoring are documented.

The free-versus-paid wording conflict lowers clarity. Public documentation supports the operating description, but missing independent outcome evidence remains an explicit limit on the score.

Frequently asked questions

  • Is MQL5 Signals one provider?
    No. It is a marketplace containing many third-party providers and monitored accounts.
  • Can one account copy several signals?
    The rules allow one signal subscription per trading account.
  • Are subscriptions refundable?
    Subscriber terms say sales are final, apart from a limited remedy for an unavailable renewed signal.

Top alternatives

Other signals our community rates highly — handy if MQL5 Signals isn't the right fit.

Sources(3)

Trader reports

No trader reports for MQL5 Signals yet — be the first to share your experience above.

No written reports yet. Submit yours above — it appears here once approved by editorial.

Reports stay public — only spam, scam promotion, and personal attacks get removed. Read the policy.

Compare

Pick two and compare

Spread, leverage, regulation, payout — same row, side by side.

Build your own Side-by-side
Florian Fendt

Florian Fendt

Written by

Founder of TraderJury and BrokerCheck. Trader since 2014. Focused on broker accountability and trader-led review systems.

Arsam

Arsam Javed

Fact checked by

Editor and reviewer at TraderJury. Verifies trader reports, audits broker disclosures, and writes risk explainers.

Visit MQL5 Signals