MQL5 Signals Review & Trader Rating
- Traders · 0 votes
- —0%
- Editorial
- 3.4100%
- External
- —0%
MQL5 Signals in a nutshell
Review basis
Based on the company's own product, help and legal pages. It does not include a real-money trading test.
What the score covers
Marketplace rules, monitoring and copying disclosures. No provider return is assigned to the marketplace.
Limits to keep in mind
Provider quality and price vary by listing, and the rules and subscriber terms differ on free subscriptions. Check the live listing before subscribing.
MQL5 Signals is a marketplace where third-party providers expose monitored MetaTrader accounts and sell subscriptions that can copy trades. The monitoring is useful, but provider risk, execution differences and a current rules-versus-terms pricing inconsistency require careful checking.
MQL5 Signals is a marketplace, not one signal provider. Each return and risk record belongs to one third-party provider and monitored account.
MetaQuotes transmits trades through MetaTrader, but broker symbols, leverage, latency and execution can still differ. The terms make no promise of profit.
The current Rules page says subscriptions are fee-based, while subscriber terms still mention free subscriptions. Rules take precedence, so users should check the live listing. Sales are generally final, apart from a narrow renewal remedy when a signal becomes unavailable.
MQL5 Signals is infrastructure and a marketplace, so it should not be read as one trading system. Each listing is tied to a provider and monitored MetaTrader account. The useful figures sit at listing level: account age, trades, growth, drawdown, deposits, withdrawals and subscription conditions. None of those numbers can be averaged into a meaningful marketplace result.
Copying takes place inside MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5. The subscriber chooses settings and links one signal to one trading account. Symbol names, contract sizes, leverage, minimum lot size, execution speed and broker liquidity can differ from the provider account. Those differences can produce smaller positions, delayed fills, skipped trades or a result that diverges materially from the chart shown on the listing.
Pricing also belongs to the selected listing. Current rules describe fee-based subscriptions, while subscriber terms retain wording about free subscriptions. The rules state that they prevail, so the live order screen is the final price check. The subscriber terms generally make purchases final, apart from a limited renewal remedy when a subscribed signal becomes unavailable.
Before subscribing, inspect whether growth depends on deposits, whether drawdown is realised or floating, how long the account has traded, and whether one position dominates the history. Start with a separate low-allocation account and compare copied fills with the provider log. Stop-loss use, trade frequency and average reward-to-risk must be checked per provider because the marketplace does not standardise them.
Have you traded with MQL5 Signals?
Your vote contributes to the community average and headline rating immediately, from the first vote. Click a star to vote — change it any time.
Is MQL5 Signals right for you?
Best for
- MetaTrader users who will evaluate a named provider account
- Users who want native in-terminal copying
Avoid if
- You want a platform-wide verified return
- You need a broad refund right
Evidence and transparency breakdown
Dimensions our methodology can assess from the evidence stored for this review.
- Transparency3.7/ 5 · Good
Detailed Signals rules and terms are public. The current rules require a real account and a monthly fee set by the provider for every signal, and cancelled subscriptions are not refunded; older subscriber terms still mention free signals, so check the price on the live listing.
- Scope control4.5/ 5 · Excellent
Product, marketplace, provider and strategy-level claims are kept separate, so one signal's results are not presented as the platform's.
Compatible platforms
Where this works and how it's priced.
Track record
Monthly records and verification status stored for this review. Blank metrics were not established · sources: mql5.com.
| Month | Return | Drawdown | Sharpe | Sortino | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provider-specific records only | — | — | — | — | — |
Pricing model
The current rules require a monthly fee set by the provider for every signal, charged in advance, and cancelled subscriptions are not refunded; older subscriber terms still mention free signals, so check the price on the live listing.
Track record
3.8 /5Provider accounts are monitored and displayed.
Cost
3.0 /5Prices are provider-specific.
Risk management
3.2 /5Copy settings exist, but responsibility stays with the subscriber.
Communication
3.5 /5Signals are delivered inside MetaTrader.
Transparency
3.7 /5MQL5 publishes its legal model and how signals are monitored.
Frequently asked questions
Is MQL5 Signals one provider?
No. It is a marketplace containing many third-party providers and monitored accounts.Can one account copy several signals?
The rules allow one signal subscription per trading account.Are subscriptions refundable?
Subscriber terms say sales are final, apart from a limited remedy for an unavailable renewed signal.
Top alternatives
Other reviewed services to compare if MQL5 Signals isn't the right fit.
Trader reports
No trader reports for MQL5 Signals yet — be the first to share your experience above.
No written reports yet. Submit yours above — it appears here once approved by editorial.
Reports stay public — only spam, scam promotion, and personal attacks get removed. Read the policy.
Pick two and compare
Spread, leverage, regulation, payout — same row, side by side.
Build your own
